Harris Sportsthoughts

Thoughts about Sport

Selectors Prefer Blondes?

with 4 comments

It is the debate that has split the country in two. The nation has not been this riven since a roundhead first offered a cavalier outside to taste his musket. It’s Blur vs Oasis. Moore vs Connery. Pro-life vs abortion.

The latest hot spud demands that each and everyone of us ask fundamental questions of our own worldview and decide exactly where we stand. Do you prefer brunettes or blondes? State or private education? North or south (Leicestershire)? Burly or willowy? Tall or really tall? Swing or seam?

Yes. It’s the continuing discussion as to whether the England selectors will opt for Tim Bresnan or Stuart Broad for the first test at Lords.

I’d go for Bresnan. The selectors will probably plump for Broad. I don’t know really.

 

Advertisements

Written by harrisharrison

July 19, 2011 at 7:42 pm

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I like Bresnan.He bowls a heavy ball.Broad’s a simpering poser with a rubbish strike rate.

    Tom

    July 19, 2011 at 8:00 pm

    • Bresnan does bowl a heavy ball. It’s probably made of York stone. Broad’s ball is made of poodle fur.

      harrisharrison

      July 19, 2011 at 8:02 pm

  2. Broad is like Flintoff – he takes wickets in big games that everyone remembers, and the rest of the time he’s rubbish.

    Bonald

    July 20, 2011 at 7:59 am

  3. We got that one right then.

    Tom

    July 25, 2011 at 6:31 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: